POSH India Help LogoPOSH India Help
Skip to statutory text

Chapter IV · Complaint

Section 9

Complaint of sexual harassment

Statutory textCounsel-reviewed publication
Any aggrieved woman may make, in writing, a complaint of sexual harassment at workplace to the Internal Committee if so constituted, or the Local Committee, in case it is not so constituted, within a period of three months from the date of incident and in case of a series of incidents, within a period of three months from the date of last incident:
where such complaint cannot be made in writing, the Presiding Officer or any Member of the Internal Committee or the Chairperson or any Member of the Local Committee, as the case may be, shall render all reasonable assistance to the woman for making the complaint in writing:
the Internal Committee or, as the case may be, the Local Committee may, for the reasons to be recorded in writing, extend the time limit not exceeding three months, if it is satisfied that the circumstances were such which prevented the woman from filing a complaint within the said period.
Where the aggrieved woman is unable to make a complaint on account of her physical or mental incapacity or death or otherwise, her legal heir or such other person as may be prescribed may make a complaint under this section.

Transcribed from the official India Code source for reading and comparison. PIH plain-language guidance is editorial and separate; this page is not legal advice.

Source: India Code, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of IndiaRetrieved: 2026-09-10India Code PDF, p. 8India Code PDF — last updated 31 August 2021

Plain Language

The aggrieved woman must file a written complaint within three months of the incident, or within three months of the last incident if there is a series of incidents.

If the complaint cannot be made in writing, the Presiding Officer or a relevant IC/LC member must render all reasonable assistance to the woman to make it in writing.

The committee can extend this deadline by up to three more months for recorded reasons, but only if it is satisfied that circumstances prevented timely filing.

If the aggrieved woman cannot file the complaint herself due to physical or mental incapacity, death, or other prescribed reasons, her legal heir or another prescribed person may file on her behalf.

The complaint goes to the Internal Committee or the Local Committee, depending on the workplace and the respondent.

Why It Matters

The three-month deadline creates urgency and prevents indefinite delays. But it is not an absolute bar — the extension provision recognises that trauma, power imbalances, or other circumstances may prevent timely filing.

The requirement that extension reasons be recorded in writing ensures accountability and creates a reviewable record.

The writing-assistance proviso prevents a formality requirement from becoming a barrier to access.

The legal heir provision ensures that death or incapacity does not extinguish the right to seek redress.

IC members must understand that the limitation period is a procedural safeguard, not a trap — automatic rejection of late complaints without considering extensions is a common error.

Practical Example

Scenario: An employee experiences repeated harassment over six months. The last incident was two months ago.

Outcome: The three-month window runs from the last incident, not the first. She has one month remaining to file a written complaint.

Scenario: A woman is hospitalised for four months following an incident of harassment at work.

Outcome: She could not file within three months due to physical incapacity. The committee can extend the deadline by up to three more months for recorded reasons, and her legal heir could also file on her behalf.

Scenario: An employee files a complaint four months after the incident with no recorded reason for the delay.

Outcome: The committee should not automatically reject it. It must first consider whether an extension is warranted and record its reasons for granting or refusing the extension.

Who Must Act

employee

  • File a written complaint within three months of the incident or the last incident in a series.
  • If unable to file due to incapacity or death, ensure a legal heir or prescribed person can file on your behalf.
  • Request an extension in writing with reasons if the three-month window has passed.

ic member

  • Record limitation decisions and extension reasons carefully in writing.
  • Render all reasonable assistance where a complaint cannot be made in writing.
  • Consider extension requests on their merits rather than applying the deadline mechanically.
  • Accept complaints from legal heirs or prescribed persons when the aggrieved woman cannot file herself.

employer

  • Ensure the IC or LC is constituted and accessible so that employees can file complaints within the deadline.
  • Do not create barriers that effectively prevent timely filing.

Compliance

File written complaint within three months of incident or last incident in a series

Actor: Aggrieved woman · Rule: Section 9(1)

Extension of time limit by up to three months for recorded reasons only

Actor: IC / LC · Rule: Section 9(1) proviso

Render all reasonable assistance where the complaint cannot be made in writing

Actor: Presiding Officer / IC or LC member · Rule: Section 9(1) first proviso

Accept complaints from legal heirs or prescribed persons in cases of incapacity or death

Actor: IC / LC · Rule: Section 9(2)

Timelines

Complaint filing deadline: 3 months

The aggrieved woman must file a written complaint within three months from the date of the incident, or from the date of the last incident in a series.

Extended filing deadline: Up to 6 months total

The committee may extend the deadline by up to three additional months (total six months) for recorded reasons if circumstances prevented timely filing.

Common Mistakes

Treating the three-month deadline as an absolute bar — the committee has discretion to extend by up to three months for recorded reasons.

Failing to record reasons in writing when the committee extends the time limit.

Refusing reasonable assistance because the aggrieved woman cannot initially put the complaint in writing.

Refusing to accept a complaint from a legal heir without inquiring into the circumstances of incapacity or death.

Computing the deadline from the first incident rather than the last incident in a series of incidents.

Requiring the complaint to be in a specific format — the statute requires it to be in writing but does not prescribe a form.

Practical PIH resources

These are separate PIH editorial, training, or support destinations. They are not substitutes for the official Act source or a statutory complaint forum.

Source & Status

Source and review statusPublication ready
Source version
India Code PDF — last updated 31 August 2021
Source location
India Code PDF, p. 8
Retrieved

View the official record page

Statutory blocks are kept separate from PIH plain-language and operational guidance. The reading copy is not legal advice.

Legal review status: counsel-reviewed. All sections have valid documentary counsel evidence and publication signals are enabled.

Judicial material: no verified judicial interpretation is published in this reading copy. Judicial analysis is a separate layer from the statutory transcription and PIH editorial guidance.